(Adele Parrillo by Terranews) With DL 1 / 2010 Article 9, which last January 1 the government has refinanced the international peacekeeping missions, the legislature amended the responsibilities of military relation to the problems of pollution and health.
Recitation DL 1 / 2010 Article 9 paragraph 4: "... is not punishable as a gross violation of provisions for environmental protection of the health and safety in the workplace for carrying out activities and events related transactions or training conducted during international missions, from which the military could not require a different behavior from the view, having regard to the powers of the powers and means at its disposal in to the tasks assigned to him. " With this Article 9 which last January 1, the government has refinanced the international peacekeeping missions, the legislature amended the responsibilities of the military in relation to the problems of pollution and health.
This may relate to lack of enforcement of standards of protection in respect of DU and nano-particles. In fact, in Somalia (1992-94) and then in Bosnia and Kosovo (1995-99) were not subject to standards of protection, while it is known that the U.S. military is protected with overalls, goggles and masks. Maybe someone is concerned about the judgments that are increasingly in recent times, are in favor of compensation for military, returned from missions sick or died as a result of diseases ricondicibili to depleted uranium contamination. In the case of Giambattista
Marica, for example, compensated with € 545,061 in the grounds of decision, issued by a court in Florence in December 2008, the courts have supported the responsibilities of the Ministry of Defence. "I ordered" reads the sentence, "the adoption di adeguate misure protettive per i partecipanti alla missione in Somalia. Nonostante fosse sotto gli occhi dell’opinione pubblica internazionale la pericolosità specifica di quel teatro di guerra, e nonostante l’adozione da parte di altri contingenti di misure di prevenzione particolari”. Secondo Falco Accame, presidente Anavafaf, Associazione nazionale vittime arruolate nelle forze armate, «la norma dell’art.9 del D.L. 1/2010, è del resto in contrasto con quanto stabiliscono i codici militari, circa i doveri dei comandanti riguardo alla tutela della salute del personale dipendente. Ed è anche in contrasto con quanto riguarda la legislazione nazionale sulla tutela della salute nei posti di lavoro (legislazione valida anche in the military).
The adoption of the rule on above, porterebbere a serious de-ownership of the commanders, because it lacks any control over behavior (which can not be a priori considered to be exemplary). Just think of what happened in Somalia in Operation Ibis, (1992-94) with the rape of Somali women by soldiers of the Tuscania. According Accame "should be borne in mind that now more than two thousand cases of the disease, for possible contamination by depleted uranium depend to a large extent, by not taking protective measures and the failure to adopt the 'precautionary principle'. The rule cited above could fall on attention to the need to ensure, as far as possible, protection to employees. "
"In fact - Falco Accame ends - it is not clear what '.. not to require a different behavior from the view', which could refer to the concept of blind obedience to orders, in contrast with what is established by the L382/78 'principles of the discipline'. " It was just a little over a year ago. In financial 2008, with Law No. 244 of December 24, 2007, he came to the recognition of the cause of service and provision of compensation to those who had contracted cancer or illness related to exposure to depleted uranium shells .. An expenditure of 10 million euro for each of the years 2008-2010. Decree Law 1 / 2010 was approved in the House on February 9 this year and was sent to the Senate where it will be discussed, with the number 2002. It will be the law?
0 comments:
Post a Comment